(Advertisement)

Reader: Constitution A Living Document

Posted: December 5, 2012 at 3:19 a.m.

Proving that “Politics in Perspective” is very much about perspective, Dr. Buddy Rogers proceeded in Sunday’s (Nov. 25) newspaper to narrow the perspective so much that it proved little else. Writing with the sound of intellectual authority about supporting and defending the Constitution, he makes a very cogent point that the Constitution does indeed need some kind of defense from myopic thinkers and writers such as himself.

This story is only available from our archives.

Opinion, Pages 5 on 12/05/2012

(Advertisement)



« Previous Story

Supreme Court Jars School Funding

Might a new Legislature stray from principles designed to make — and keep — the education oft ered to Arkansas schoolchildren both constitutionally adequate and equitable? Read »

Next Story »

LETTERS

Recycling of secession I have heard much about states’ rights to secede with the 2012 reelection of President Barack Obama. Read »

Good points that the Founders were not all in agreement with each other, and that they were capable of changing their mind.

Posted by: Coralie

December 5, 2012 at 1:46 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

.
>> in The Federalist, brilliantly arguing together for the centralized form of government the document authorized.<

This appears to be a major sticking point for T'baggers as they now call for secession.

I didn't read Rogers column because he's become just another partisan shill, low on information and high on his own opinions,
.

Posted by: cdawg

December 5, 2012 at 4:55 p.m. ( | suggest removal )