Missourians’ vote to increase dog breeding rules contentious

— This is an agricultural state, home to more than 100,000 farms and exporter of a big share of the nation’s yearly haul of beef, pork, milk and soybeans. This year, attention has focused on another commodity: puppies.

More than one of every three dogs sold in pet stores nationwide come from Missouri, whose breeders produce hundreds of thousands of dogs each year, according to one estimate. That distinction has made this state the target of a well-financed ballot referendum to place tougher regulations on businesses that raise and sell dogs.

The effort pits animal rights groups, led by the Humane Society of the United States, which compiled the estimate, against agricultural interests - old foes who have recently done battle in many states over the welfare of farm animals. Animal rights groups have won a number of protections for animals, as those who make their living selling livestock complain that they are being regulated out of business.

“I am an American; I have a right to raise dogs,” said Joe Overlease, president of the Professional Kennel Club of Missouri, who owns a large breeding operation of cocker spaniels in southern Missouri that was cited by the state this year for overcrowding and inadequate shelter. “I have a right to bark at the moon if I want.”

The Missouri ballot measure, known as Proposition B, would limit the size of dog breeding operations and establish minimum quality of lifestandards, including requiring additional space, access to the outdoors and periods of rest for females between litters. It would not increase the number of inspectors, currently 12 for the 1,450 licensed breeders statewide. Similar laws have been adopted by 15 states in the last three years, according to the Humane Society, and a recent Mason-Dixon poll showed wide support.

The campaign in support of the proposition has blanketed the state with advertisements against “puppy mills,” the label critics prefer, featuring grainy video images of law enforcement raids on breeding facilities where frail and listless dogs live cramped in wire cages piled with excrement.

“We’ve seen extremely poor overall health because of puppy mill owners putting profit above the health of their breeding stock,” said Kathy Warnick, president of the Humane Society of Missouri.

But leaders of the livestock industry have worked to turnthe vote into a referendum on the Humane Society, a nonprofit group based in Washington that has spent more than $2 million in support of the initiative. Outgunned financially, opponents describe Proposition B as a proxy battle in the Humane Society’s larger war to end pet ownership, ban hunting and institute vegetarianism throughout the United States - charges the Humane Society calls ridiculous.

“This is just a first step,” said Charles E. Kruse, president of the Missouri Farm Bureau. “It’s pretty clear their ultimate desire is to eliminate the livestock industry in the United States.”

In recent years, the Humane Society has scored several significant victories in its campaign to limit the use of factory farming techniques with more conventional livestock like cattle, pigs and chickens- winning a California ballot initiative in 2008 to increase the size of animal cages and, last summer, wresting similar concessions in Ohio.

The group has also taken aim at some forms of hunting, including campaigning for a ballot measure in North Dakota that would prohibit big game hunting in fenced enclosures.

But Michael Markarian, chief operating officer of the Humane Society, said the Missouri effort was unrelated. “We have concerns with factory farming, and we’ve worked to make it more humane,” he said. “This is a separate matter related only to dogs. And most people don’t think that dogs should be treated like livestock.”

Opponents, like the State Veterinary Medical Association, say Missouri, unlike many states, already has a robust setof laws to protect its breeding dog population, adding that the bulk of problems occur with unlicensed breeders. But Humane Society leaders say theydecided to push for greater changes here because Missouri remains the hub of the industry and because legislative efforts have repeatedly failed.

Front Section, Pages 5 on 10/31/2010

Upcoming Events