Today's Paper River Valley Democrat-Gazette Obits Public Notices Newsletters Distribution Locations Digital FAQ Razorback Sports Today's Photos Crime Puzzles
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Court sets date to hear appeal in Duggar’s child pornography conviction

Kid-porn case to be heard next month by Ron Wood | January 18, 2023 at 3:44 a.m.
Duggar

FAYETTEVILLE -- A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Josh Duggar's appeal of his child pornography conviction Feb. 16 in Kansas City.

Duggar, 34, of Springdale was convicted Dec. 9, 2021, of possessing child pornography by a federal court jury in Fayetteville. U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks sentenced him to 12½ years in federal prison May 25.

Duggar was charged with two counts involving receiving and possessing child pornography.

The jury found him guilty on both counts after more than six hours of deliberation over two days.

He was sentenced on the single count of receiving child pornography because possession of child pornography is considered a lesser included offense under federal law.

Duggar is serving his sentence at a federal prison in Texas.

In addition to his prison sentence, Duggar was also ordered to serve 20 years of supervised release after his prison term and to pay a $10,000 fine.

Brooks also levied three special assessment fees totaling $40,100.

Prosecutors accused Duggar in early 2021 of using the internet to download and view child pornography, some of which depicts the sexual abuse of children younger than 12, according to court documents.

They told jurors child pornography was repeatedly downloaded on the computer at Duggar's used car lot May 14, 15 and 16 of 2019.

Duggar's attorneys contended he didn't do it and suggested an unidentified, remote user may have downloaded the child pornography.

Duggar's appeal has been delayed repeatedly by his lawyers asking for more time.

They're seeking to overturn his federal child pornography conviction or at least get a new trial.

The appeal cites three specific issues:

• "Whether the district court violated Duggar's constitutional right to present a complete defense by precluding Duggar from calling and, if necessary, impeaching a critical witness at trial."

• "Whether the district court erred by denying Duggar's motion to suppress statements after a federal agent physically stopped him from contacting his attorney and subsequently interrogated him outside the presence of his counsel."

• "Whether the district court erred by permitting the government's expert to offer testimony on EXIF metadata and prohibiting Duggar's expert from testifying to the unreliability of the methodology used by the government's expert."

EXIF metadata is a set of metadata attached to photo or video files, such as when and where a photo was taken and with what device. It stands for exchangeable image file format.

Prosecutors say the claims are without merit. Brooks rejected the arguments during and after Duggar's trial.

  photo  Josh Duggar
 
 


Print Headline: Oral arguments set in Duggar appeal

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT