Today's Paper Obits Digital FAQ Newsletters Coronavirus 🔴 Cancellations 🔴NWA Screening Sites Virus Interactive Map Coronavirus FAQ Crime Razorback Sports Today's Photos Puzzles
ADVERTISEMENT

MANILA, Philippines -- Maria Ressa, a Filipino-American journalist known for her critical coverage of President Rodrigo Duterte, was found guilty of cyber libel by a court Monday in a case that has come to symbolize deteriorating press freedom in the Philippines.

Ressa, who heads the news organization "Rappler," was charged along with a former researcher, Reynaldo Santos Jr., for an article the site published in 2012. They could face between six months and six years in prison, but they will be allowed to post bail. They must also pay almost $8,000 in damages.

Human-rights watchdogs and media organizations have decried the charges as politically motivated harassment. "Rappler" has been at the forefront of hard-hitting reporting on Duterte's policies, particularly a war on drugs that has left thousands of people dead and prompted United Nations condemnation.

"To the Filipinos watching this, this is not just about 'Rappler,'" Ressa said after the hearing, her voice breaking. "This is not about us. This is about you. Because freedom of the press is the foundation of every single right you have as a Filipino citizen."

The conviction of Ressa, 56, comes as Duterte and his allies widen a campaign against the administration's critics. Authorities recently shut down the country's largest broadcaster and have pushed through a broadly defined anti-terrorism bill that human rights advocates say institutionalizes a crackdown on the populist leader's detractors. Duterte is expected sign the bill into law within the next month.

The Philippines, once considered to have the freest press in Asia, has become one of the world's most perilous places for journalists. This year, it slipped two spots to 136th place in the World Press Freedom Index. Duterte has previously called "Rappler" "fake news" and said that journalists are not exempt from assassination, though his spokesman Harry Roque said Monday the president was "not behind the supposed suppression of free speech."

The case against Ressa centers on a 2012 article written by Santos that cited an intelligence report linking businessman Wilfredo Keng to trafficking and drug smuggling. Keng denied the allegations and filed a complaint in 2017, leading the Justice Department to indict Ressa and Santos last year under the cyber libel law, which the court said Monday has a longer statute of limitations than regular libel provisions.

"Rappler" maintained that Ressa did not edit the article herself, as she does not oversee day-to-day operations in her role as executive editor. Press freedom advocates have said the decision to lodge the case against Ressa, rather than the editors involved, demonstrated that officials were targeting her.

A peculiar aspect of the case is that the article was published four months before the cyber libel measure was signed into law by former President Benigno Aquino III.

Laws cannot be applied retroactively, but the Justice Department argued that the article was republished in 2014 when a "Rappler" staffer fixed a typographical error online, effectively putting it within the law's jurisdiction. The tiny edit, which "Rappler" argued did not constitute republication, involved correcting the spelling of "evasion."

A former CNN correspondent, Ressa is perhaps the Philippines' best-known journalist, and her conviction cast a chill over the media industry, particularly for lesser-known practitioners who fear they may be targeted more easily.

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International called for Ressa's conviction to be quashed. The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines said it was a "dark day for the independent Philippine press," while Reporters Without Borders labeled the proceedings "Kafkaesque" and a "shocking judicial masquerade."

"This could signal an open season on critical, hard-hitting journalists who serve such an important role in underserved communities, especially in places outside of the capital," said Human Rights Watch Philippines researcher Carlos Conde. He said the verdict degraded press freedom in ways not seen since the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos, which ended in 1986.

Speaking after the verdict, Ressa told journalists to continue fighting for their rights. "We are meant to be a cautionary tale. We are meant to make you afraid," she said. "I appeal again, don't be afraid."

Sponsor Content

Comments

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with our commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. Our commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT