Today's Paper Digital FAQ Obits Newsletters NWA Vaccine Information Covid Classroom Coronavirus NWA Screening Sites Virus Interactive Map Coronavirus FAQ Coronavirus newsletter signup Crime Razorback Sports Today's Photos Puzzles
ADVERTISEMENT

Pension concern a McClatchy bankruptcy snag

by ELIZA RONALDS-HANNON AND JEREMY HILL BLOOMBERG NEWS | February 19, 2020 at 1:55 a.m.

A plan to have Chatham Asset Management take ownership of bankrupt McClatchy Co. swiftly ran into obstacles as a government agency raised concerns that the newspaper chain's dealings with the hedge fund disadvantaged its pensioners.

The courtroom fight, part of bankruptcy proceedings that McClatchy kicked off last week, traces back to a series of debt deals Chatham arranged in 2018. They were seen by some in the market as a clever play -- if they can withstand legal scrutiny.

Chatham owned the vast majority of McClatchy's unsecured bonds in 2018 when it helped provide a new loan for the newspaper chain to extinguish those old debts. While the deal gave McClatchy more time to repay its borrowings, it was a boon for the hedge fund because it was able to trade in bonds that had been on equal footing with pension claims and other creditors, in favor of new secured debt that allowed the fund to leap-frog them in the repayment line.

On Friday, the U.S. agency responsible for insuring pension plans demanded that a Manhattan bankruptcy court allow time to scrutinize the deals, saying they raise "significant concerns of possible fraudulent transfer."

"We need an opportunity to investigate," Kimberly Neureiter, an attorney for the government's Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., told the court.

McClatchy's bankruptcy plan calls for handing ownership of the company to Chatham in exchange for extinguishing some of its debt. It's also seeking to terminate its pension and hand control to the pension agency, which would continue paying the company's pensioners.

But the agency objected to a proposal that may give the hedge fund broad legal protections for the past deals. Judge Michael Wiles agreed, saying there was no reason, so early, to make it harder to challenge those transactions.

"I don't really understand, on the very first day of this case, why I should be entering an order that essentially approves stipulations from you that would be obstacles to the PBGC," Wiles said in the hearing, referring to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. "I can't do that."

Chatham's attorney, Andrew Rosenberg of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison, said that wasn't the hedge fund's intent: "We weren't trying to preclude anyone."

Representatives for Chatham and McClatchy declined to comment further.

McClatchy, owner of the Miami Herald, Kansas City Star and other newspapers, filed for bankruptcy Thursday. It said it planned to continue operating newsrooms as usual during the Chapter 11 proceedings.

Chatham has long been involved in financing McClatchy and by 2018 was its largest shareholder. The hedge fund snapped up almost all of McClatchy's unsecured bonds, according to regulatory filings that year, and swapped a chunk of them for secured debt.

Initially, the move could have led to two windfalls for Chatham at once. While improving the firm's position as a lender, the transactions also boosted the value of a bet in which the hedge fund had used derivatives to insure other investors against a default by McClatchy. The deal effectively would have meant that a bankruptcy wouldn't have triggered a payout on the contracts, known as credit-default swaps. The newspaper publisher and Chatham later tweaked the terms of the swap so that the derivatives would still pay out in the event of a default.

McClatchy was essentially insolvent when it entered into the debt swap in 2018, potentially leading to arguments that Chatham's claims should be "partially or completely subordinated," the pension agency said, asking that potential claimants be given time to pursue action.

Lawyers for Chatham agreed to move the request for legal protections to a later hearing.

McClatchy has struggled to manage the liability of its qualified pension, a private plan for employees that was underfunded by about $535 million as of an accounting last year.

In January it signed an agreement with the pension agency that allowed it to skip a payment while continuing to have the agency take over the $1.375 billion plan altogether. The agency covered the skipped payment, and pensioner payouts weren't interrupted.

In its bankruptcy plan, McClatchy is seeking to terminate its qualified pension and appoint the agency as its trustee, according to a statement Thursday. In that scenario, the agency would continue to provide plan participants their benefits, and McClatchy would pay the agency $3.3 million each year for 10 years, along with 3% ownership of the company.

Business on 02/19/2020

Print Headline: Pension concern a McClatchy bankruptcy snag

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT