Members of Congress who pushed for the "opportunity zone" provision in the 2017 federal tax law said it would help businesses and entrepreneurs in low-income communities. The tax break rewards investors for spending capital gains on businesses or real estate in more than 8,000 economically distressed neighborhoods selected by governors.
The incentive "will unlock new private investment for communities where millions of Americans face the crisis of closing business, lack of access to capital and declining entrepreneurship," said a bipartisan congressional group -- Sens. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and Cory Booker, D-N.J.; and Reps. Pat Tiberi, R-Ohio, and Ron Kind, D-Wis. -- in announcing the idea.
But almost two years after the tax break became law, and almost two months after President Donald Trump's administration clarified how private equity firms, venture capitalists and other investors can qualify for the tax break, only a handful of people have started funds that focus on operating businesses. Many are still trying to figure out how to satisfy both the IRS and investors eager for high returns.
Meanwhile, real estate-focused funds have already raised billions. And real estate companies are cashing in. For example, Kushner Cos. -- the family business of Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner -- has been buying up property in the zones, according to The Associated Press.
Confusing U.S. Treasury Department rules have held business-focused funds back, said John Lettieri, president and chief executive officer of the Economic Innovation Group, a public policy group in Washington, D.C., that lobbied for opportunity zones. Now that the agency has issued more guidance, Lettieri said, "opportunity funds that are geared toward investing in local businesses are going to proliferate."
But the tax break has always been easier to apply to real estate.
"The truth is, it's a tax break that's place-based," said Napoleon Wallace, a former deputy secretary of the North Carolina Department of Commerce and a founding partner of Opportunity North Carolina, a group that helps expedite deals in the state.
The opportunity zone tax break is several incentives in one. Investors defer paying income taxes on capital gains that they invest in special funds that, in turn, invest in real estate or businesses in the zones. After five years, investors get a tax break on those gains. After seven years, the tax break increases. And most importantly, after 10 years, they can pocket any money they earn from their zone investment tax-free.
Brian Phillips is an entrepreneur who is confident he can find promising tech startups that are already in a zone or willing to move to one. But last year, when Phillips was considering creating an opportunity zone fund focused on businesses, he was "kind of the only one."
Investors had to wait until the April release of Treasury guidelines to learn how businesses would qualify as being in a zone for tax purposes. The guidelines said businesses need to perform at least half their services in a zone, pay half their wages in the zone, or generate half their income from a mix of property and management functions in a zone.
Yet despite the new clarity, investing in businesses remains more complicated than investing in real estate.
Buildings, by definition, stay put. And while 10 years is a long time to own a building, a property that's delivering good returns after five years likely will still be a good investment in 10, said Michael Kressig, an opportunity zones expert and partner at Novogradac, an accounting and consulting firm.
Businesses, on the other hand, can change a lot in 10 years. They might fail, get acquired, go public, move or radically change their business model.
"It is contrary to your normal kind of private equity, or venture capital, investment-hold periods to think about holding something for 10 years," Kressig said.
There's not much that fund managers can do to control the business cycle, and it's difficult to delay business decisions -- such as whether to relocate -- until the 10-year mark.
Many fund managers have "sort of landed on the understanding that this is a best-efforts proposition," Kressig said, "and so I can't -- and I'm not going to -- promise an investor that they're going to get 100% of these tax benefits."
Investors could still make money if a growing company leaves a zone, said Chris Schultz, CEO of LaunchPad, a chain of co-working spaces that also makes venture investments.
"If a company is moving out of a zone, presumably it's because something very good is happening," he said. LaunchPad is setting up a $20 million opportunity zone fund focused on startups in mid-sized cities.
Business-focused funds also may face more technical difficulties than real estate funds do. For instance, while a real estate fund can be set up to focus on a single project, Phillips' fund has to spread investments over several companies to soften the blow to investors in case any of the companies fails.
"The real estate [opportunity] fund is not that much different from what these real estate companies have been doing for a long, long time," said Phillips, now managing partner of an opportunity fund called the Pearl Fund LP. For him, however, setting up a fund was uncharted territory.
Venture capitalists and public equity firms still have a good pitch for investors. Phillips is looking for startups growing so fast that they could increase his original investment 10 times over, or more.
"The relative tax benefits are actually better for investing in operating businesses, particularly those with heavy capital assets," said Jonathan Tower, managing partner at Arctaris, an impact investment fund manager based in Boston.
Tower is planning to raise over $500 million for an opportunity zone fund and spend it on up to 25 primarily industrial and manufacturing companies, including some that he'll shepherd through mergers and acquisitions with other companies.
Business on 06/15/2019
Print Headline: Property firms get tax-zone benefits