Today's Paper Obits Digital FAQ Newsletters Coronavirus 🔴 Cancellations 🔴NWA Screening Sites Virus Interactive Map Coronavirus FAQ Crime Razorback Sports Today's Photos Puzzles

Georgia voters fearing Russian-style meddling with the U.S. state's electronic voting machines are expected to find out by month's end whether they'll be going back to paper ballots in a November election with one of the nation's most closely watched gubernatorial races.

A good-government group claims in a lawsuit that Georgia's paperless system is at such great risk that the Republican-led state is violating residents' constitutional rights by failing to fix the problem, even after Congress and the Justice Department flagged the system as ripe for abuse.

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, scheduled a hearing for Wednesday in Atlanta and said she'll issue an opinion within two weeks on the group's request for a paper ballot.

"We have heard repeatedly from all our top officials that Russia is going to keep doing this -- it's urgent we do whatever we can right now to minimize any problems," said Wendy Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, who isn't involved in the suit.

"We haven't acted fast enough to upgrade our voting equipment."

Georgia's election databases and 27,000 touch-screen voting machines could be hacked to erase valid registrations, add fake voters and even switch votes to decide which candidate wins, the group said in the lawsuit. Georgia is an inviting target, they say, because its machines are easy to hack and the state has a large number of registered voters -- about 7 million.

"Georgia's voting system is a catastrophically open invitation to malicious actors intent on disrupting our democracy," the group claims.

Georgia is balking at the group's proposal to replace the current system with paper ballots in all 159 counties before Nov. 6. Secretary of State Brian Kemp said in a recent court filing that the group's worries are based on "paranoia" and the speculation of so-called experts.

"There is no 'Paper-Ballot Fairy' who, with magic wand at ready, can save plaintiffs' half-baked 'plans' from devolving into fiasco," Kemp said in a filing. "Plaintiffs' 'cure' is worse than the disease."

The group of voters is joined in the case by a small nonprofit called the Coalition for Good Governance, which describes itself as a nonpartisan organization "focused on election transparency and verifiability."

The voter group has tapped John Carlin, the chairman of Morrison & Foerster's global risk and crisis management practice who was once the Justice Department's highest-ranking national security lawyer and chief of staff to Robert Mueller when he led the FBI. The lawyers from the Washington office of the San Francisco-based firm are representing the voters for free.

In November, Mueller, now the special counsel investigating Russia's interference in the 2016 election, said a group of 13 Russians had sought "to identify vulnerabilities" in voting systems in several Georgia counties. The state is one of five with "the most serious election security vulnerabilities," according to a July report by congressional Democrats.

Georgia's system, put in place in 2002, leaves no paper trail. The software hasn't been supported by Microsoft Corp. since 2013. And the hardware is similar to what you'd find "in a very low-end general-purpose personal desktop computer in use in the early 2000s," the group said.

The cost of printing ballots alone "would soar by orders of magnitude," the state said in a filing, adding that a deployment of optical scanner machines would also be needed. "At this late date, converting to an exclusively paper-ballot election cannot be done without compromising the public interest," the state said.

A Section on 09/13/2018

Print Headline: Georgia lawsuit says risk is high for vote hacking

Sponsor Content


COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with our commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. Our commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.