Today's Paper Obits Today's Photos Northwest Profiles NWA EDITORIAL: The enforcers Best of Northwest Arkansas Crime Puzzles
story.lead_photo.caption FILE - In a March 21, 2018 file photo, Debbie Burke, left, an elementary school teacher in Pike County, and her husband Gary Burke rally against a proposed pension overhaul bill, in Frankfort, Ky. Franklin County, Ky., Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd on Wednesday, June 20, 2018 ruled that the process the Republican-led legislature used to enact the law violated the state Constitution. (AP Photo/Bruce Schreiner, File)

LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- A Kentucky judge on Wednesday struck down a new public-pension overhaul law that angered thousands of teachers who marched on the state Capitol and closed dozens of school districts in protest.

Franklin County Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd, who was assigned to referee the state's biggest political fight, said the process the GOP-led Legislature used to enact the law violated the state constitution.

Lawmakers changed the state's woefully underfunded public retirement systems in the waning days of this year's legislative session.

The case turned into the latest round of a bitter feud between Republican Gov. Matt Bevin and Democratic Attorney General Andy Beshear.

Beshear, who sued to block the measure, called the ruling a "win for open, honest government" and said it voids the law in its entirety.

Bevin, who signed the bill earlier this year, did not immediately comment on the ruling.

Lawmakers passed the bill in March to make changes to Kentucky's public pension systems, some of the worst-funded retirement plans in the country. It also changed how current teachers can use their sick days to calculate their retirement benefits. The vote came late in the legislative session on a bill that would mostly affect future hires.

Lawmakers used a legislative maneuver to introduce the bill and pass it on the same day without making it available to the public.

In making their case, the law's detractors had pointed to constitutional provisions requiring a bill to be read on three different days.

Bevin's attorneys argued that the "three-readings requirement" was a political question that should be left to the legislative branch.

The judge disagreed. Shepherd said the requirement was enacted by the constitution's framers "to ensure that legislators and the public know the substance and the content of the bills they vote on. It is a constitutional mandate -- not an internal procedural rule of the General Assembly."

A Section on 06/21/2018

Print Headline: Pension overhaul struck in Kentucky

Sponsor Content