Today's Paper Newsletters LEARNS Guide Asa Hutchinson 2024 Today's Photos Public Notices Crime Distribution Locations Obits Puzzles Digital FAQ Razorback Sports

Tesla fire inquiry to focus on battery

by BILL VLASIC AND JACLYN TROP THE NEW YORK TIMES | November 25, 2013 at 1:28 a.m.
Federal safety inspectors are examining whether design of the Tesla Model S and its advanced lithium-ion battery pack — seen here at the Tesla Motor Co. assembly plant in Fremont, Calif. — are behind two recent battery fires.

DETROIT - A federal safety investigation of the Tesla Motors electric Model S sedan announced last week comes at a critical juncture for the car and the company.

For the first time, regulators are examining whether the design of the high-end vehicle and its advanced lithium-ion battery pack are defective and the cause of two battery fires.

After garnering high praise for its styling, performance and eco-friendly electric power, the Model S will be the subject of scrutiny by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, said the company welcomed the inquiry.

At issue is whether the size, shape and chemical makeup of the car’s battery makes it prone to fires when its lithium-ion cells are punctured in a collision.

Musk has repeatedly defended the design of the Model S, which won early accolades for its safety from regulators and independent publications like Consumer Reports. But the car has caught fire on three occasions in less than two months - twice in the United States and once in Mexico.

By comparison, the Nissan Leaf - the best-selling all-electric car on the market - has not had any reported fires.

A federal defect investigation can take months to complete and could include crash tests of the vehicle well beyond the ordinary government testing done on cars before introduction.

Tesla said it would increase the ground clearance of the Model S, and it also pledged to extend its current vehicle warranty to cover fire damage.

But those changes are not expected to divert the focus of the investigation, or minimize the potential for the safety agency to order structural changes and a vehicle recall.

“Adjustments or modifications of the vehicle will not affect the inquiry,” said Karl Brauer, an analyst with the auto research firm Kelley Blue Book. “That is out of Tesla’s hands now, and the range of potential outcomes is very wide.”

Musk’s track record as a Silicon Valley entrepreneur gave the company credibility that helped it secure a $465 million loan from the Department of Energy in 2010. Glowing reviews of the Model S, which is priced at$70,000 and higher, fueled investor interest in a public stock offering that allowed Tesla to pay back its government loans early.

Musk has not retreated from his position that the Model S is safer from fires than vehicles with gasoline engines.

And in a blog posting on the company website Monday, Musk went so far as to assert that Tesla asked federal regulators to conduct the safety investigation to allay any fears about electric cars.

The agency denied Tuesday that the inquiry was opened because of a Tesla request.

The swift rebuttal of Musk underscores how Tesla’s relentless promotional campaign is wearing thin on regulators charged with making the nation’s vehicles and roadways safe.

The agency had originally cleared the Model S of possible defects after the first vehicle fire, which occurred Oct. 1, when the car struck a metal object on a highway in Kent, Wash., outside of Seattle.

A high-speed crash in Mexico on Oct. 18 also resulted in a fire, but that incident was beyond the scope of U.S. regulators. A third fire occurred Nov. 6 on a highway in Smyrna, Tenn., near Nashville, after a Model S ran over a tow hitch in the roadway.

That accident prompted regulators to revisit their earlier pronouncement of the car’s safety.

Industry analysts said the Model S inquiry would center on the exposure of its battery pack, a long, flat slab that runs almost the entire length of the underside of the vehicle.

Brauer, the Kelley Blue Book analyst, said the safety agency’s investigation would most likely include puncture testing the battery, and then monitoring chemical reactions that may occur after the battery is damaged.

If the design is deemed structurally unsound, the agency could recommend that Tesla add a protective covering to the cars, which would be expensive and could compromise its performance.

Business, Pages 22 on 11/25/2013

Print Headline: Tesla fire inquiry to focus on battery


Sponsor Content