Suit filed over Iowa abortion law

Fetal heartbeat measure puts state suddenly in spotlight

Emma Goldman Clinic co-director Francine Thompson speaks during a news conference, Tuesday, May 15, 2018, in Des Moines, Iowa. Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union said Tuesday that they had filed a lawsuit challenging the nation's most restrictive abortion law, an Iowa provision that bans most abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, around the sixth week of pregnancy. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)
Emma Goldman Clinic co-director Francine Thompson speaks during a news conference, Tuesday, May 15, 2018, in Des Moines, Iowa. Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union said Tuesday that they had filed a lawsuit challenging the nation's most restrictive abortion law, an Iowa provision that bans most abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, around the sixth week of pregnancy. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

DES MOINES, Iowa -- A lawsuit challenging the nation's most restrictive abortion law was filed Tuesday in Iowa, a state that for years was largely left out of Republican efforts to overturn abortion protections and where the Democratic attorney general has refused to defend the law.

If allowed to take effect, the law would ban most abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, around the sixth week of pregnancy, a point when, abortion-rights groups say, many women don't know that they are pregnant.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America announced the filing of the complaint in Polk County District Court in Des Moines. The lawsuit seeks an injunction to halt the law's July 1 implementation. Litigation could take years.

Until the 2016 election, Iowa had little to no role in the broad GOP effort to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion.

"We haven't heard much out of Iowa until the past couple of years," said state policy analyst Elizabeth Nash of the Guttmacher Institute, a national research group that supports abortion rights and tracks legislation tied to abortion. "It has been a very striking shift in the state Legislature, and it really shows how important state Legislatures are to abortion access."

The election flipped control of the Iowa Senate, putting Republicans in charge of the state Legislature and the governor's office for the first time in two decades. Until then, Democrats had maintained enough political power to curtail Republican-led anti-abortion attempts.

Chuck Hurley is chief counsel for the Family Leader, a faith-based group in Iowa that opposes abortion. He recalled being at an election night party alongside several state lawmakers. When it became clear that Republicans would win statehouse control, Hurley said he immediately worked the room to talk about abortion legislation.

"It is very interesting that a purple state is this out front on life," Hurley said, adding, "There's a pent-up pro-life effort here in Iowa."

Several abortion restrictions were adopted in 2017, including a 20-week abortion ban and a requirement that a woman wait three days before ending a pregnancy. The waiting provision, one of the longest in the country, is on hold because of a different lawsuit.

Separately, a coalition of Iowa anti-abortion organizations mounted its own efforts last year. The Coalition of Pro-Life Leaders put aside years of disagreement to help win passage of the 20-week ban and the six-week ban.

"The pro-life movement in Iowa is unified for the first time in many years," said Maggie DeWitte, executive director of Iowans for Life, one of the coalition's groups.

Iowa Republicans last year also gave up millions in federal dollars to create a state-funded family planning program that prohibits participation from abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood.

Other plaintiffs in the lawsuit include Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, the affiliate's medical director and the Emma Goldman Clinic in Iowa City.

The abortion-rights groups declined to make the legal documents public until the court clerk filed and stamped official copies. That was likely to happen later Tuesday or sometime today, they said.

Shortly after the announcement of the lawsuit, Iowa's longtime attorney general said he would not defend the law. Democrat Tom Miller said the decision to remove his office from the case was based on a belief that the measure "would undermine rights and protections for women."

Miller said the Thomas More Society, a conservative Chicago-based law firm, has agreed to defend the law for free. The firm had no immediate comment.

Suzanna de Baca, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, said Iowa's abortion law is tied to a small group of "very extreme politicians" in the state Legislature.

"The perception of Iowa is that we have been a rational, relatively progressive state that has always valued the health of our citizens," she said. "It seems very uncharacteristic and extreme for an abortion ban of this magnitude to happen here."

The lawsuit names Gov. Kim Reynolds and the Iowa Board of Medicine as defendants, according to the abortion-rights groups. Reynolds, who signed Iowa's ban earlier this month, said at a public event in Davenport that she felt "very confident" about defending the lawsuit, adding: "It's about life. It's about protecting life."

Information for this article was contributed by Ryan J. Foley of The Associated Press.

A Section on 05/16/2018

Upcoming Events