Voting-fraud panel scoffs at bias claims

FILE - In this Nov. 4, 2015, photo, New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner watches, left, as Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump fills out his papers to be on the nation's earliest presidential primary ballot at The Secretary of State's office in Concord, N.H. (AP Photo/Jim Cole, File)
FILE - In this Nov. 4, 2015, photo, New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner watches, left, as Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump fills out his papers to be on the nation's earliest presidential primary ballot at The Secretary of State's office in Concord, N.H. (AP Photo/Jim Cole, File)

MANCHESTER, N.H. -- The vice chairman of President Donald Trump's commission on election fraud on Tuesday dismissed criticism that the panel is bent on voter suppression, saying there's a "high possibility" it will make no recommendations when it finishes its work, and even if it does, it can't force states to adopt them.

Trump, a Republican, created the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in May to investigate his unsubstantiated claims that millions of people voted illegally in 2016. Democrats have blasted the commission as a biased panel determined to curtail voting rights, and they ramped up their criticism ahead of and during the group's daylong meeting in New Hampshire.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said some voters have canceled their registrations or been hesitant to register since learning that the commission has asked state governments to provide data on individual voters.

"Their voting suppression impact has already begun," he said in a call with reporters that was organized by the Democratic National Committee.

[PRESIDENT TRUMP: Timeline, appointments, executive orders + guide to actions in first 200 days]

The commission in June requested any records considered public by states, including driver's license numbers and partial Social Security numbers. No state is sending all of the information sought, and 14 states have denied the commission's request.

There was no mention of the data request during the commission's meeting, which included presentations about historical election turnout data, electronic voting systems and issues affecting public confidence in elections. But speaking to reporters afterward, the group's vice chairman, Kris Kobach, emphasized that states are being asked to send already public information and called the Democrats' criticism about voter suppression "bizarre."

"The claim goes something like this, the commission will meet, then they'll recommend things like photo ID or some other election security measure, then the states will adopt them. There's your leap in logic. The commission does not have the ability to do a Jedi mind trick on a state legislature and force them to adopt anything," said Kobach, the Republican Kansas secretary of state.

"All the commission is doing is collecting data. It may make recommendations or I think at this point there's a high possibility the commission makes no recommendations and they just say here's the data; states, do with it what you want."

Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the information being collected in one central place, though the commission has said the detailed data will not be made public and will be destroyed when the commission is done with it.

Kobach said 20 states have sent data so far. He said the commission hopes to use it to investigate possible cases of people voting in multiple states but said that will depend on how much information it gets.

"It may be that the commission is not able to say we were able to look at all 50 states, and here is the size of this particular problem," he said.

Kobach also was admonished by fellow commission member and Democratic New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner after clarifying recent comments he made alleging voter fraud in New Hampshire.

Kobach last week wrote a column for the conservative site Breitbart claiming that statistics on thousands of people who used out-of-state licenses to register to vote in New Hampshire amounted to proof that people enter the state from elsewhere specifically to cast fraudulent votes and that "it appears" that's why Democrat Maggie Hassan won her U.S. Senate seat in November.

He said Tuesday that he's "still wondering" if he used the right language to describe the New Hampshire situation, acknowledging that that state allows college students and others to vote in the state without becoming residents and getting driver's licenses if they consider the state their domicile.

"Until further research is done ... we will never know the answer regarding the legitimacy of that particular election," Kobach said.

Gardner, who has resisted calls for him to leave the commission over Kobach's comments, said the Senate race results were "real and valid" and reminded Kobach to stay on task.

"In the first couple of meetings we had, the chairman of commission made it very clear to me ... we work in a way that we don't have preconceived or preordained ideas about what the facts are going to be," he said.

A Section on 09/13/2017

Upcoming Events