Trump's NATO jabs a boost to arms trade

A fighter pilot sits in the cockpit while a crew member checks the exterior of a Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35A jet before a training flight at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, in October
A fighter pilot sits in the cockpit while a crew member checks the exterior of a Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35A jet before a training flight at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, in October

Donald Trump is right to say says America's NATO allies aren't paying their share of the costs. But, to the delight of the arms industry, that could be changing.

Trump reaffirmed his skepticism about the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and his readiness to make deals with Russia, in European media interviews published recently. Trump's positions on the subject have held fairly steady -- leaving European leaders wondering whether they can still rely on the American security umbrella.

"Let's not fool ourselves," German Chancellor Angela Merkel said. "There is no infinite guarantee."

So Merkel's Germany, and many other European nations, are increasing military budgets. The plans predate Trump, and under NATO rules they should've been carried out long ago. The alliance expects its members to spend 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense. But it's no secret that most of them don't. The shortfall added up to about $121 billion last year at 2010 prices, according to Bloomberg calculations based on NATO country estimates.

Since President Trump is promising to increase America's already enormous military budget too, the prospect of a European arms-shopping spree is a win-win for suppliers. Investors have noticed: From Raytheon and Lockheed Martin to Thales, defense contractors have hit all-time highs since Trump's election.

"This is the best market for defense in many years, across the board," said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Teal Group in Fairfax, Va.

NATO was established after World War II to protect Western democracies against the Soviet Union. A key tenet is that an attack on any alliance member is considered an attack on all. And that's what Trump has questioned.

If Russia moved against one of NATO's Baltic members, Trump told The New York Times in July, he'd come to their aid only after reviewing whether they have "fulfilled their obligations to us."

Before the Trump ascendancy, NATO members had agreed in 2014 to move toward the 2 percent threshold. One-fifth of that money is supposed to be used to buy hardware. European Union nations, most of which are also in NATO, also promised to increase defense spending at their year-end summit last month.

Germany, which spent 1.2 percent of its GDP on defense last year, according to NATO figures, has announced the biggest increase in 25 years -- an extra $11.2 billion through 2020. France has approved increased outlays for this year. Altogether, 19 of NATO's 28 members have increased military budgets in the past 18 months, according to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report.

Even in Europe's "new strategic reality" in which NATO guarantees are no longer unconditional, some defense budgets will likely fall short, said Jan Techau, head of the Richard C. Holbrooke Forum at the American Academy in Berlin.

"The Europeans will have to do something," he said. "But I have my doubts that we'll get across-the-board 2 percent spending."

Still, Trump's presidency may increase the likelihood they'll follow through. Raytheon's Chief Executive Officer Thomas Kennedy sees a parallel with Middle Eastern nations that stepped up spending during the Obama administration as the United States signaled its attention would shift elsewhere.

"These countries were given a message to beef up their defensive system," Kennedy said at an industry conference in November. Raytheon "saw that writing on the wall" and was able to register "significant international growth" in the period, he said. The company signed a $2.4 billion deal in 2014 to sell a missile defense system to Qatar, for example.

Mideastern arms spending increased by about one-third during Barack Obama's first six years, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, which monitors the weapons trade.

"We also see those same messages on the wall now with this new administration," Kennedy said. "We're going to see, we believe, even more uptick in Europe."

BAE Systems, Europe's largest defense contractor, also stands to benefit. Its chairman, Roger Carr, welcomed the pressure from America's 45th president.

"I personally agree with his stance on the whole business of NATO," Carr told Bloomberg TV in Davos last week. "If you're a participant, you should be a contributor."

Raytheon and BAE were among the defense stocks that surged the day after Trump's election, as analysts rushed to recommend them. Barclays upgraded Lockheed Martin Corp., Northrop Grumman Corp. and L3 Technologies Inc. as analyst Carter Copeland said Trump's win "gives new life to a bullish trade." The main Standard and Poor's defense index has added 11 percent since then, almost double the gain on the broader S&P 500.

"All of the big defense companies will find a way to participate in these buildups," said retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark, a former NATO supreme allied commander.

Of course, Trump's international policy remains embryonic. His nominees for key posts have sounded less conciliatory toward Russia: Prospective Defense Secretary James Mattis branded it a "strategic competitor" at a Senate confirmation hearing, and stressed the importance of NATO. Mattis did echo Trump, though, by saying he'd encourage alliance members to spend more on defense.

Some of the extra European cash would go to local suppliers, but U.S. companies have an advantage with big-ticket items such as Lockheed's fighter jets, said Loren Thompson, chief operating officer of the Lexington Institute think tank.

"Given the pressure that Trump is exerting, it's easy to imagine more will sign on to the F-35 [fighter jet] program, to the tanker program, to the trainer program," said Thompson, who's also a Lockheed consultant.

The new administration isn't all upside for defense contractors. Trump has already criticized Lockheed and Boeing for their defense-system prices.

Still, the combination of a maverick president, insecure allies and unresolved conflicts worldwide probably suits the industry.

"Threats are rising," Thompson said. "Although that is bad news for most people, it's good news for arms makers."

Information for this article was contributed by Birgit Jennen, Tony Czuczka, Benjamin Katz and Dave Merrill of Bloomberg News.

SundayMonday Business on 01/22/2017

Upcoming Events