N.D. pipeline-fight tactics spread

Tribes’ methods being used to protest projects in other states

Activists and residents from across Bergen County, N.J., deliver petitions in Hackensack, N.J., against the proposed Pilgrim Pipeline project in New York and New Jersey in 2016.
Activists and residents from across Bergen County, N.J., deliver petitions in Hackensack, N.J., against the proposed Pilgrim Pipeline project in New York and New Jersey in 2016.

BISMARCK, N.D. -- Prolonged protests in North Dakota have failed to stop the flow of oil through the Dakota Access Pipeline, but they have provided inspiration for protests against pipelines in other states.

The months of demonstrations that sought to halt the four-state pipeline have largely died off with the February clearing of the main protest camp and the completion of the pipeline, which will soon be moving oil from North Dakota to a distribution point in Illinois.

Four Sioux tribes are still suing to try to halt the project, which they say threatens their water supply, cultural sites and religious rights. Despite a series of court setbacks in the weeks since President Donald Trump moved into the White House, Dakota Access protest organizers don't view their efforts as wasted. They say the protests helped raise awareness nationwide about their broader push for cleaner energy and greater respect for the rights of indigenous people.

"The opportunity to build awareness started at Standing Rock, and it's spreading out to other areas of the United States," said Dave Archambault, the chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which has led the legal push to shut down the pipeline project.

As protesters left the area in southern North Dakota where the Dakota Access pipeline crosses under a Missouri River reservoir that serves as the tribes' water supply, organizers called on them to take the fight to other parts of the country where pipelines are in the works.

The tactics used in North Dakota -- resistance camps, prominent use of social media, online fundraising -- are now being used against several projects. They include the Sabal Trail Pipeline that will move natural gas from Alabama to Florida; the Trans-Pecos natural gas pipeline in Texas; the Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline that will move natural gas from Pennsylvania to Virginia; and the Diamond Pipeline, which will carry oil from Cushing, Okla., across Arkansas to Valero Energy Corp.'s refinery in Memphis.

The tactics are also being used against projects that are still in the planning stages, including the proposed Pilgrim oil pipeline in New York and New Jersey and the proposed Bayou Bridge Pipeline in Louisiana.

Dakota Access opponents have also vowed to fight against the resurgent Keystone XL Pipeline, which would move crude oil from Canada to Nebraska and on to Texas Gulf Coast refineries.

"A big part of our message was not just to nationalize the fight against Dakota Access, but to highlight regional issues that people are facing," said Dallas Goldtooth, an organizer with the Indigenous Environmental Network. "To use our momentum."

The influence of the Dakota Access protest is evident in various forms. For example, some who protested in North Dakota have gone to Texas and Florida to help with those demonstrations, according to Goldtooth. The Red Warrior Society, a pipeline protest group that advocated aggressive tactics in North Dakota, is promoting resistance in other states via social media.

In Arkansas, more than 50 people marched in Fayetteville in December against the Diamond Pipeline, saying it would cross five rivers and 11 watersheds. On March 20, the Pope County sheriff's office arrested a man who had chained himself to equipment intended for use in the construction of the pipeline.

There are nearly a dozen accounts on the GoFundMe crowdfunding site seeking money to battle the Sabal Trail and Trans-Pecos pipelines. The Society of Native Nations, which is fighting the Trans-Pecos, used the protest camp model from North Dakota to set up a camp in Texas, according to Executive Director Frankie Orona.

"I really believe this momentum is going to stay alive," said Orona. "Standing Rock was the focal point, was the root of this movement. If we learned anything from Standing Rock, it's the power of unity. It wasn't one [tribal] nation -- it was more than 400."

The energy industry and its allies say they're unconcerned.

U.S. Rep. Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican who has advised Trump on energy issues, said pipeline developers have learned to prepare for resistance, and he thinks the anti-pipeline movement will fade if protesters fail to achieve their goals and get discouraged.

Juliana Schwartz, senior campaigner for Change.org, which helps people and groups advance causes, disagrees, saying the environmental protest movement appears to be strong. A "people against pipelines" page on the group's website recently listed 16 petitions related to energy projects -- mostly pipelines -- in more than half a dozen states, with nearly 725,000 supporters.

"The broader movement to stop resource extraction has taken inspiration from [Dakota Access]," Schwartz said.

"I think we can expect to see this trend continue as more and more communities feel that their safety and health is under threat due to the president's support of the fossil fuel industry over marginalized communities."

Information for this article was contributed by Justin Juozapavicius, David Warren, Dave Kolpack and Ken Miller of The Associated Press; and by staff writers of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

A Section on 04/03/2017

Upcoming Events