Privacy laws murky on digital inheritance

States move to close accessibility gaps

FILE - In this May 25, 2016 file photo, Illinois Rep. Emanuel Chris Welch, D-Westchester, speaks to lawmakers at the Capitol in Springfield, Ill.
FILE - In this May 25, 2016 file photo, Illinois Rep. Emanuel Chris Welch, D-Westchester, speaks to lawmakers at the Capitol in Springfield, Ill.

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. -- When people die, laws cover how their houses, cars, and other property are passed on to relatives. But the rules are murkier -- and far more restrictive -- when it comes to pictures on Facebook, emails to friends or relatives and even financial records stored in online cloud accounts.

Google, Facebook and other companies have said a federal privacy law, approved decades before digital storage became common, prevents them from releasing electronic memories or records unless the account owner grants permission -- even if the person is dead. Without an estate plan, families must try to crack passwords or take the costly step of litigating the matter to access photos and emails -- and some have, with little success.

The laws governing how to divide belongings after someone dies have not caught up with the technological advances that have permeated the ways people communicate, but states have begun trying to bridge that gap. This year, Illinois was one of 19 states that passed laws to clarify what Internet companies can release after someone dies and when information should remain inaccessible.

"I post quite a bit on Facebook. I post a lot of photos. If something were to happen to me, maybe my wife would like to have access to those photos," said Rep. Emanuel Chris Welch, a state legislator who sponsored Illinois' measure.

With the new laws, unless a person expresses otherwise, companies will release basic information from a user, such as the person's email contact list, to help find friends or gather an inventory of a person's assets. But to get the actual contents of the emails -- even the subject lines -- or photos and documents stored in a cloud service, people must proactively specify whom they want to have their digital belongings.

The federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act, passed in 1986, doesn't anticipate the release of online information when executing wills. Because probate law is typically left to the states, the laws that legislatures are passing could effectively set new rules.

The Chicago-based Uniform Law Commission received the support of Internet companies as it wrote the legislation that states are passing, but that wasn't always the case. Initially, the commission wanted administrators of estates to have access to everything from users' accounts in cases in which they did not leave instructions about what to do with their digital assets.

Only one state, Delaware, managed to pass that version of the commission's proposal, but 27 legislatures tried and failed in 2014.

Carl Szabo, senior policy counsel at NetChoice, an industry group that represents the interests of such companies as Facebook, Google and PayPal, said the revised legislation "balances the needs of the bereaved with the privacy interests of the account holders and the people with whom they corresponded."

Iowa, Utah and West Virginia are among a dozen states that have drafted bills seeking to join the 19 that enacted laws.

Facebook allows users to choose a "legacy contact" to access their account, and Gmail has an "account trustee" option. In instances where people use those options, the companies' agreements with them will supersede the state laws.

Even with the new laws, planning is necessary at a time when many still don't think about the contents of their Internet accounts as property.

"This is one of those many examples where the law really gets its power by giving people the knowledge that it exists," said Washington state Sen. Jamie Pedersen, the sponsor of the state law passed this year.

The promise of privacy that companies offer users has led to heartache and frustration for the families of account holders who have had to go to court for the right to access their relatives' emails and photos.

In 2005, Yahoo turned over more than 10,000 pages of emails in a CD to the family of Lance Cpl. Justin Ellsworth, a Marine from Michigan whose family went to court for the material. But others have not been successful.

The family of John Ajemain in Massachusetts has been unable to get his emails from Yahoo after his death in 2006. And in 2012, Facebook quashed a subpoena from the family of Sahar Daftary, a model who fell to her death from an apartment building in Manchester, England, in 2008.

In Virginia, after Ricky Rash's 15-year-old son, Eric, killed himself in 2011, Facebook provided a CD with the contents of his account but not his password. Rash still struggles with the notion that for decades people have stumbled upon mementos while cleaning out a late parent's home, but in the digital age those keepsakes can be out of reach.

"What is the difference of the shoe box full of letters and pictures under the bed or in the attic?" Ricky Rash asked. "You go in as a child taking care of your parents' estate, you may find something in those memoirs that surprises you."

A Section on 10/03/2016

Upcoming Events