Court rejects Michigan recount

Wisconsin’s proceeds; Pennsylvania’s awaits hearing Friday

Election worker Summer Stewart and other staff members in Detroit check through presidential ballots Tuesday that were cast in Wayne County, Mich. The recount could be stopped today.
Election worker Summer Stewart and other staff members in Detroit check through presidential ballots Tuesday that were cast in Wayne County, Mich. The recount could be stopped today.

DETROIT -- Michigan's presidential recount suddenly became in doubt Tuesday as a state appeals court said the Green Party candidate's poor showing disqualified her from seeking a second look at the votes.


RELATED ARTICLES

http://www.arkansas…">Trump touts Japanese deal as jobs-maker http://www.arkansas…">Cotton joins in call for Trump scrutiny

Meanwhile, the fate of a statewide recount push in Pennsylvania must wait at least until Friday, when a federal judge has scheduled a hearing on it.

President-elect Donald Trump narrowly defeated Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in both states and in Wisconsin, which started its recount last week. The recounts, requested by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein, were not expected to change enough votes to overturn the result of the election.

A recount in Michigan that started Monday might end after the state appeals court said Stein has no standing to have the votes recounted. The court said she finished fourth in the election and doesn't qualify as an "aggrieved" candidate under Michigan law.

The court ordered the state election board to reject her recount petition. The board meets again today.

[TRUMP: Timeline of president-elect’s career + list of appointments so far]

Attorney General Bill Schuette said the decision means the recount "must stop." But Stein's attorney, Mark Brewer, insisted the recount isn't over.

The ruling came a day after U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith ordered an immediate statewide recount of roughly 4.8 million ballots. Eight counties have started, including the largest, Wayne County. But Goldsmith's decision dealt with the timing of the recount, not whether Stein had standing. Schuette said he would ask Goldsmith to set aside the ruling in light of the state court's decision.

Trump won the state by about 10,700 votes, or two-tenths of a percentage point, over Clinton.

Also Tuesday, a Republican-controlled committee approved legislation that would require candidates who lose by more than 5 percentage points to pay 100 percent of the estimated recount cost. Those candidates now pay $125 per precinct, which is Stein's case is nearly $1 million. Republican Secretary of State Ruth Johnson has said the recount may cost $5 million. The bill would retroactively apply to Stein, though Democrats questioned the constitutionality of changing the rules "in the middle of the game."

In Wisconsin, Trump so far had widened his victory margin over Clinton by 146 votes, with 23 of the state's 72 counties having finished their recounts as of Tuesday. In those counties, Trump gained 105 votes and Clinton dropped 41 votes.

In the initial count, Trump defeated Clinton in Wisconsin by about 22,000 votes.

A federal judge has scheduled a hearing for Friday in a lawsuit filed last week by a Trump voter and two super PACs seeking to stop the recount.

In Pennsylvania, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond in Philadelphia on Tuesday scheduled a hearing Friday on the request for a recount. The Republican Party and Trump warned that the case threatens Pennsylvania's ability to certify its election before the next Tuesday's federal deadline. Stein's team hasn't produced evidence of hacking but has called Pennsylvania's election system "a national disgrace."

Also Tuesday, Pennsylvania election officials updated the state's vote count to show that Trump's lead over Clinton had shrunk to about 44,000 out of more than 6 million votes cast. That is still shy of Pennsylvania's 0.5 percent trigger for an automatic statewide recount.

Stein, who received about 1 percent of the vote in all three states, says her intent is to verify the accuracy of the vote. She has suggested, with no evidence, that votes cast were susceptible to computer hacking.

Separately, in Nevada, a partial recount of the race was requested by independent presidential candidate Roque De La Fuente, who finished last with a fraction of 1 percent of the vote.

He paid about $14,000 for the recount to provide what he called a counterbalance to the recounts sought by Stein.

Most of the 92 precincts being re-counted are in the Las Vegas area, with eight of the precincts in four other counties. If the sample shows a discrepancy of at least 1 percent for De La Fuente or Clinton, a full recount will begin in all 17 Nevada counties.

Clinton defeated Trump in Nevada by 27,202 votes, out of 1.1 million votes cast. Nevada Secretary of State spokesman Gail Anderson said the recount will be finished by the end of the week.

Information for this article was contributed by Ed White, Marc Levy, Scott Bauer and Ken Ritter of The Associated Press.

A Section on 12/07/2016

Upcoming Events