NEW ORLEANS -- A federal judge upheld Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriages Wednesday, a rare loss for gay-marriage supporters who had won more than 20 consecutive rulings overturning bans in other states.
U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman also upheld the state's refusal to recognize same-sex marriages performed legally in other states. His ruling was the first to uphold a state ban since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act last year.
Feldman acknowledged that his won't be the final word.
"Clearly, many other courts will have an opportunity to take up the issue of same-sex marriage; courts of appeals and, at some point, the U.S. Supreme Court," he wrote. "The decision of this Court is but one studied decision among many."
Gay-rights advocates said they would carry the case to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which already has before it an appeal by the state of Texas of another federal judge's ruling that struck down that state's gay-marriage ban.
In 2004, 78 percent of Louisiana voters approved an amendment to the state constitution banning gay marriage.
Gay marriage is currently allowed in 19 states and the District of Columbia. Courts have overturned gay-marriage bans in several other states, but those rulings are on hold as the cases work through the appeals process.
Isabel Medina, a professor at the Loyola University New Orleans law school, said she didn't see the Louisiana ruling as a significant roadblock for gay-marriage advocates. Even a 5th Circuit decision upholding Feldman's ruling would affect only three states: Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, she noted.
It's likely the Texas case will be the first to go to the 5th Circuit, and cases from other states are expected to reach the Supreme Court before Louisiana's, said professor Carl Tobias of the University of Richmond School of Law in Virginia. Nevertheless, he said, Feldman's ruling is significant.
"It is important because Feldman is a very experienced federal district judge, and no other federal judge has ruled that way at the trial level," Tobias said. Feldman was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1983.
Feldman said gay-marriage supporters failed to prove that the ban violates equal protection or due-process provisions of the U.S. Constitution. He also rejected an argument that the ban violated the First Amendment by effectively forcing legally married gay couples to state that they are single on Louisiana income tax returns.
Feldman sided with the state, which had argued that the nation's high court in the Defense of Marriage Act decision recognized the rights of state voters and legislatures to define marriage.
"Although opinions about same-sex marriage will understandably vary among the states, and other states in free and open debate will and have chosen differently, that does not mandate that Louisiana has overstepped its sovereign authority," he wrote.
The conservative Louisiana Family Forum praised the ruling.
"This ruling confirms that the people of Louisiana -- not the federal courts -- have the constitutional right to decide how marriage is defined in this state," Gene Mills, the group's president, said in a news release.
Gay-marriage advocates disagreed with Feldman's ruling, arguing that the ban violated constitutional due process and equal-protection rights.
"Every citizen of the United States deserves protection of their rights, uphill climb or not," said Mary Griggs, chairman of Forum for Equality Louisiana.
Feldman said the Supreme Court decision "correctly discredited" the Defense of Marriage Act's effect on a New York law legalizing same-sex unions. But he also noted language in the decision outlining the states' historic authority to recognize and define marriage.
He also said that neither the Supreme Court nor the 5th Circuit has defined gay people as a protected class in discrimination cases.
"In light of still-binding precedent, this Court declines to fashion a new suspect class. To do so would distort precedent and demean the democratic process," Feldman wrote.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is currently considering arguments over six gay-marriage cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.
Two other appellate courts -- the 10th Circuit in Denver and the 4th Circuit in Virginia -- have overturned statewide gay-marriage bans in Oklahoma, Utah and Virginia. Those rulings are among others that were put on hold while appeals are considered.
Information for this article was contributed by Janet McConnaughey of The Associated Press.
A Section on 09/04/2014