At high court, opinions often quietly edited

Some revisions substantive, risk legal errors, study finds

Posted: May 25, 2014 at 5:19 a.m.

The Supreme Court has been quietly revising its decisions years after they were issued, altering the law of the land without public notice. The revisions include "truly substantive changes in factual statements and legal reasoning," said Richard Lazarus, a law professor at Harvard and the author of a new study examining the phenomenon.

This story is only available from our archives.


« Previous Story

California rampage toll 7

Elliot Rodger is shown in an image from his YouTube video, posted Friday but since taken down, in which he spoke of loneliness and frustration and “slaughtering” people.

A California gunman who went on a rampage near a Santa Barbara university stabbed three people to death at his... Read »

Next Story »

Vexed judges say justice foundering

Little Rock police officer Charles Nellums loads a man into a van at the Little Rock District Court in April after he appeared before Judge Vic Fleming on his 12th charge of driving with no license, among other charges. He was ordered jailed in lieu of a $20,000 bond. By lunchtime that day, the Pulaski County jail had closed to all but the most serious offenders. The prisoner wound up being taken to a jail in Sheridan.

During a recent session of Little Rock District Traffic Court in Judge Vic Fleming's courtroom, Anthony Piggee... Read »