Some Jewish parents question circumcision

Saturday, January 4, 2014

WASHINGTON - When his pregnant wife first challenged circumcising their son, Mike Wallach had a gut reaction: “That’s what we do, we’re Jews!” But doubts about whether the surgery was medically necessary and concern over his wife’s opposition forced Wallach to confront some questions.

Can you be Jewish without Judaism’s oldest ritual? he says he asked himself. What does it mean to be Jewish?

Speaking with God, the 37-year-old screenwriter and grandson of Holocaust survivors explained he was using the “free will and brain you gave me” to reject circumcision. God, he concluded, wouldn’t be impressed by the desire to do something simply “for tradition’s sake.”

“I wasn’t at peace until I had that conversation,” Wallach said.

Wallach is among a small but growing number of Jews who are slowly altering what has for millennia been considered perhaps Judaism’s core rite. The Bible says an adult Abraham circumcised himself to mark the covenant between him, his descendants and God. Any male who doesn’t circumcise, God says in Genesis “that soul will be cut off from its people; hehas broken My covenant.”

Many Jews, according to rabbis and the ritual circumcisers known as mohels, are now rejecting the classic festive circumcision ceremony, called a brit milah, or bris. A very small percentage, including Wallach, are not circumcising at all.

Binyamin Biber, a rabbi of the small movement called Secular Humanistic Judaism, is perhaps the only rabbi in the Washington area who advertises his willingness to bless a welcoming ceremony for a boy who is uncircumcised.

“We live in a more cosmopolitan world and Jewish families have become very intercultural,” Biber said. “For those families, a ceremony which regards Jewish males as privileged seems problematic, to put it mildly.”

Religion, Pages 13 on 01/04/2014