Court upholds EPA rules for air-polluting emissions

WASHINGTON - A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld the Environmental Protection Agency’s emission standards for mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired power plants.

In its ruling, the court rejected state and industry challenges to rules designed to clean up chromium, arsenic, acid gases, nickel, cadmium, mercury and other toxins.

The standards are the first federal mercury controls for power plants.

The EPA’s determination in 2000 that regulating emission standards is appropriate and necessary, and the agency’s reaffirmation of that determination in 2012, “are amply supported by EPA’s findings regarding the health effects of mercury exposure,” said the court.

Congress mandated the EPA rules under the Clean Air Act but did not specify what types or levels of public health risks should be deemed a hazard under federal law. By leaving this gap in the statute, Congress delegated to the EPA the authority to give reasonable meaning to the term “hazard,” said the court.

In the majority were chief judge Merrick Garland and judge Judith Rogers, both appointees of President Bill Clinton. Judge Brett Kavanaugh, an appointee of President George W. Bush, joined most of the decision, but he parted company with his colleagues on the issue of cost - specifically, whether the EPA is obligated to consider industry costs in deciding whether regulation of hazardous air pollutants from power plants is appropriate.

“The problem here is that EPA did not even consider the costs,” Kavanaugh said. “And the costs are huge, about$9.6 billion a year - that’s billion with a b - by EPA’s own calculation.”

In response, the majority said the EPA properly decided that the decision of whether to regulate mercury should be based on health risks, not compliance costs. The majority added that the EPA had determined the benefits of the rule exceeded costs by a factor of at least 3-to-1. Some industry groups have said the EPA was overstating the benefits.

It is only in the first stage of rule making that the EPA doesn’t consider industry costs, said the majority opinion. It added that the second stage leads to standards that are more restrictive and that, when setting those, the EPA does consider costs.

The new regulations are designed to remove toxins from the air that contribute to respiratory illnesses, birth defects and developmental problems in children.

Most companies operating power plants will have until March 2015 to meet the standards, but a state could grant an additional year and the EPA could extend the deadline to 2017 if the unit were critical for reliability.

The EPA proposed the rules in 2011.

Tuesday’s ruling is “a giant step forward on the road to cleaner, healthier air,” said Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, which was a party in the case.

The EPA called the decision “a victory for public health and the environment.”

“These practical and cost effective standards will save thousands of lives each year, prevent heart and asthma attacks, while slashing emissions of the neurotoxin mercury, which can impair children’s ability to learn,” the EPA said.

Information for this article was contributed by Dina Cappiello of The Associated Press.

Business, Pages 27 on 04/16/2014

Upcoming Events