When only a few can bring down the economy of a Country, possibly of the World, you should learn now what it is like to live with the concept of the “chosen people”.
Welcome to the ideal of a Greater Israel.

“Many simultaneous rebellions stirred up in Arab Countries will benefit in the end only the State of Israel with the expansion of its territory
while...
in Europe and in the US, the financial resources "like magic" will disappear through bailouts, tax cuts and elaborated emergency maneuvers which will be ruled only to appear beneficial for those Countries but instead appositely designed for their collapse (except for England that will push Europe over the precipice).

The Deception supported by the media is the Zionist main weapon and there is a risk that people will realize what is happening only when it will be too late and there will be no alternatives.
Thus, one should not listen to the media but observe the events.

TV media and newspapers will never tell you that an Israeli firm had placed the explosives that brought down the 3 buildings in NY on 9/11. ICTS was the only security firm in charge for the twin towers and building 7 (most people still do not know about this building that fell without being hit by any plane or other). ICTS was also the security company in charge for all airports that had allowed the highjack planes on 9/11 to depart. The work force of ICTS was the only people to have access at night inside the 3 buildings and to allow Israeli agents to place those explosives inconspicuously before 9/11. Israeli agents were in fact arrested nearby on 9/11 transporting large amount of explosives in a white van (Chevrolet 2000) but they were later released by the Bush administration. Not as a coincidence, the same day, on 9/11 2001, and at the same time, a CIA operation called Able Danger was reproducing a military exercise that was supposed to mimic an attack by few planes crashing on buildings. But all this was never reported by the media although the future of all people depends on how 9/11 is intended.

First of its kind, this worldwide crisis was provoked through a terror event (9/11) plotted by a US president, George Bush, in cahoots with the Israeli Mossad.
This event was plotted to destabilize the equilibrium of every Country and trigger a chain of events almost unavoidable all of them part of the same Plan.”

There is only one Solution for this planned chain of events.

www.wavevolution.org/en/index.html

Posted by: wavettore

March 3, 2013 at 1:02 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

The sequester was Obama's idea from the very beginning. He now acts like it is a terrible thing. The low informed voters really believe he is trying to do the right thing. This is the democrats fault all the way.

Posted by: footballfan

March 3, 2013 at 1:32 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Today is the 1400th day without a budget from the democrat controlled Senate. The GOP controlled House passes one every year. The Senate is a disgrace, especially Harry Reid.

Posted by: footballfan

March 3, 2013 at 3:31 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

FootB: "The sequester was Obama's idea... He now acts like it is a terrible thing.">>

It was designed to be a terrible thing (and overwhelming supported by your republicans, I can pull the voting record if you like). It was designed to be so dumb that even republicans wouldn't let it happen. Underestimated that one!

Footb: "The low informed voters...">>

You might want to avoid the topic of "low informed voters" Mr. Football.

Footb: "This is the democrats fault all the way.">>

Americans now trust Democrats more than republicans on every, single, domestic, issue:

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/201...

And they also know that compromise is a dirty word in conservative land. People who like simplistic black/white up/down answers, sometimes would rather commit societal suicide than engage in the necessarily democratic process of compromise. Some call them "suicide conservatives." I just call them fanatics, and quite harmful to a well functioning society.

D.
------------
"The ‘suicidal’ Republican resistance to compromise"

Excerpt:

"In his column last Saturday, the New York Times‘ Charles Blow referred to these unbendable Republicans as “suicide conservatives.” These are the folks that will not support any sort of compromise even among their own party. Not only are these conservative partisans willing to go down, but they’ll take down those around them."
http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/13/the-su...

Posted by: fayfreethinker

March 3, 2013 at 6:36 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

FFT: Face it, your President doesn't care about the people. He could have stopped the cuts like a good leader would. He wanted the sequester to happen and thought lthe people would blame the repubs. He tried his "apocolypse" tactic and it didn't work. He is the fault of these cuts. He could have stopped it but he just plays games; he is not a leader to be trusted. If we don't get this fiscal house in order, people don't realize how bad it will be. We are so self-absorbed and the time is getting very short. Next is the debt ceiling crisis again. More debt to China - if they lend us any. If not, then WHAT?? Apocolyse? Maybe.

Posted by: mycentworth

March 3, 2013 at 7:04 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

MyC: "Face it, your President doesn't care about the people.">>

Funny, the American people rehired him for the gig, and as I just showed above, they also trust Demo's on all of the main domestic issues.

MyC: "He could have stopped the cuts like a good leader would.">>

I suppose he could have given a bunch of tax cuts to the rich and made major cuts to things that help the poor, but if the American people had wanted that kind of nonsense, they would have voted for the wealthy Mormon guy.

MyC: "He wanted the sequester to happen...">>

No, he absolutely did not.

MyC: "thought lthe people would blame the repubs.">>

If he does (and he probably does because he's smart), he's also probably right. The republicans tried this nonsense in the mid '90's, with famous results.

MyC: "He is the fault of these cuts.">>

It was overwhelmingly approved by your republicans.

MyC: "We are so self-absorbed and the time is getting very short.">>

I know, "He is coming quickly." --circa 1,900 years ago.

MyC: "More debt to China">>

China has a small portion of our debt.

MyC: "if they lend us any. If not, then WHAT??">>

We'll print more. Money is a human abstraction. You shouldn't get yourself so worked up about it. You live in the best time in human existence and in the county with the greatest collection of wealth. Quit whining about silly stuff and enjoy your life. Soon it will be over and then you will be gone.

D.
------------
"Moreover -- if I may put another strain on you -- he [Man] thinks he is the Creator's pet. He believes the Creator is proud of him; he even believes the Creator loves him; has a passion for him; sits up nights to admire him; yes, and watch over him and keep him out of trouble. He prays to Him, and thinks He listens. Isn't it a quaint idea? Fills his prayers with crude and bald and florid flatteries of Him, and thinks He sits and purrs over these extravaganicies and enjoys them. He prays for help, and favor, and protection, every day; and does it with hopefulness and confidence, too, although no prayer of his has ever been answered. The daily affront, the daily defeat, do not discourage him, he goes on praying just the same. There is something almost fine about this perseverance. I must put one more strain upon you: he thinks he is going to heaven!" -- Mark Twain, "Letters from the Earth"

Posted by: fayfreethinker

March 3, 2013 at 8:23 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

FFT uses an MSNBC link to prove a point about conservatives. That network has a love affair with Obama and all his liberal idiots. That network along with others carry no weight with over half of
America. All your links are extreme left wing fanatical.

Posted by: footballfan

March 3, 2013 at 10:02 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

I clicked on the msnbc link. (what courage!) Nothing bad happened.

The NYT also has similar data:

http://tinyurl.com/ch4ry64

There's more at the Pew Research Center:

http://tinyurl.com/a846l28

"GOP Seen as Principled, But Out of Touch and Too Extreme"

If anyone can find data suggesting that the Republican party is actually trusted to a greater degree than the Dems, post a link.

Posted by: FrankLloydLeft

March 3, 2013 at 11:10 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Great video, freethinker.

Sort of pisses one off. No, it pisses one off big-time. Too bad our conservative readers are so paralyzed with confirmation bias and fear of dangerous liberal links. They won't see it.

Doesn't leave any doubt about who has the resources to buy their own politicians and why the tax code is structured the way it is. And why conservatives who don't get it may never get it.

Posted by: FrankLloydLeft

March 3, 2013 at 11:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

footballfan says "We are going to be exactly like Europe very soon."
Which part of Europe would that be? (There are 27 countries in Europe.)
Luxembourg and Norway still have much higher GDP per capita than U.S., and .Switzerland is about the same as U.S.

Posted by: Coralie

March 4, 2013 at 2:33 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

FFT said: "China has a small portion of our debt">>

MyC: "If that is true,...">>

It is true. Here's the break down in one easy chart:

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos...

MyC: "...my gosh, we are in worse condition than I even thought!!">>

To put it bluntly, what you think, and what is actually the case, rarely tend to overlap. When you said: "More debt to China," you were just regurgitating what you've heard endlessly repeated on the right-wing media noise machine. Or as GW Bush's own speech writer put it, you are being lied to by the "conservative entertainment complex." See below.

D.
------
"I believe the Republican Party is a party of followership. The problem with the Republican leaders is that they're cowards.... The real locus of the problem is the Republican activist base and the Republican donor base. They went apocalyptic over the past four years. And that was exploited by a lot of people in the conservative world. I won't soon forget the lupine smile that played over the head of a major conservative institution when he told me that our donors think the apocalypse has arrived.

Republicans have been fleeced and exploited and lied to by a conservative entertainment complex... I'll say it again ... the conservative followership has been fleeced, exploited and lied to by the Conservative Entertainment Complex. Because the followers, the donors and the activists are so mistaken about the nature of the problems the country faces the nature--I mean, it's just a simple question. I went to Tea Party rallies and I would ask this question: "have taxes gone up or down in the past four years?" They could not answer that question correctly. Now it's true that taxes will go up if the President is re-elected. That's why we're Republicans. But you have to know that taxes have not gone up in the past. And "do we spend a trillion dollars on welfare?" Is that true or false? It is false. But it is almost universally believed."
--David Frum, adviser and speechwriter to GW Bush

Posted by: fayfreethinker

March 4, 2013 at 3:32 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Given your apparent and persistent disinclination to learn (or even know) much of anything about the actual topics of these threads or, indeed, most of the sidetracks and rabbit-holes (whether introduced by you or by others), "takes one to know one" seems a logical explanation for your sudden burst of reasonable speculation. If you in fact had to study the matter of sanity as it applies to wavetorre's post, then by all means please apply such rigorous preparation to your future comments as well.

Posted by: AlphaCat

March 4, 2013 at 6:22 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

US debt to China and the effects of it are summed up here in this Forbes article from January 2013:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza...

China makes mucho money on the US and using that as leverage in the naitonal defense arena isn't likely according the experts.

Posted by: Tankersley101

March 4, 2013 at 9:23 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Hey Tank, that was a good article.

I used to be a big deficit hawk, then I studied it more and learned that I was wrong.

Posted by: fayfreethinker

March 4, 2013 at 9:40 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

AlphaCat,

I agree with your assetion that there is a price to pay for living in the greatest country in the world. And as I have already pointed out by citing a Forbes article, the US debt to China isn't a great security threat as believed by many according to some experts. However, our current fiscal habits have "long term implications for the economy" as pointed out in the same article.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza...

Posted by: Tankersley101

March 5, 2013 at 12:29 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

FFT,

That article is absolutely from Forbes, as the URL would suggest. Are you picking and choosing which parts of the article to agree with, just so I am clear?

Posted by: Tankersley101

March 5, 2013 at 2:03 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

>>Good article, Tankl. I sure hope those US banks that hold most our debt, don't get too big to fail again. <

It is a good article, Tank and the very same thing I learned in Econ 101 back before cars had computers.
But leave it to Roger Ailes and Company to create near-hysteria when there's reason for none.

What difference would it make if banks are too big to fail?

Here's something in the money game you folks don't seem to grasp: Banks will never be liable for anything, at least not the major players who control 80% of the banking. Money is created out of thin air, just a few lines of computer code is all that's needed. Then it begins to flow down. Later down the chain it becomes a trickle.
Money is strictly a human creation. However, it is used to value your time which is all anyone truly has.

Posted by: cdawg

March 5, 2013 at 3:28 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

cdawg,

I also have taken ECON101(was microecon for me.. wish now I'de have taken macro), and I get what you are saying about the creation of money. I think that the long term effects of over spending (printing more money) are relative to consumer and lender confidence, both domestically and globally.

Buck,

Hope you are doing good today, good sir.

----------------------------------------------------------
Your friendly ballcap wearing "young man" serving else where but thinkin' bout the Ozarks everyday

Posted by: Tankersley101

March 6, 2013 at 11:49 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )