No extra time for SEC suit, justices rule

— The Securities and Exchange Commission must move more quickly in pressing some fraud lawsuits, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in a decision that has the potential to affect agencies across the government.

The justices unanimously ruled in favor of two Gabelli Funds LLC officials seeking to block the agency’s claims that they improperly let a client engage in market timing, a practice of making frequent, shortterm trades at the expense of other investors. They contend the agency missed the five-year deadline to file the lawsuit.

The case raised issues similar to those addressed by the Supreme Court in 2010, when it ruled that the two-year period for shareholder fraud suits doesn’t begin until investors have indications of intentional company wrongdoing.

“Unlike the private party who has no reason to suspect fraud, the SEC’s very purpose is to root it out, and it has many legal tools at hand to aid in that pursuit,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court.

The ruling might affect the agency’s investigation of purported insider trading at Steven Cohen’s SAC Capital Advisors LLC. This July will be the five-year anniversary of its 2008 sale of a $700 million-plusposition in two drug companies, just days before the public release of negative information drove those companies’ share prices down.

In November, the agency notified the hedge fund’s management that it planned to file a civil case against SAC Capital claiming it failed to supervise its employees. The agency in November sued former SAC portfolio manager Mathew Martoma, accusing him of using nonpublic information to persuade Cohen to make the sale. Prosecutors also filed criminal charges against Martoma.

In the Supreme Court case, Marc Gabelli and Bruce Alpert contended that the agency suedafter the five-year window for seeking penalties had expired. A federal appeals court in New York had said the suit could go forward because the window doesn’t open in fraud cases until the agency has reason to know a violation has occurred.

At the time of the purported wrongdoing - from 1999 to 2002 - Gabelli was the portfolio manager for the Gabelli Global Growth Fund and Alpert was chief operating officer of Gabelli Funds.

The case is Gabelli v. SEC, 11-1274.

Information for this article was contributed by Greg Farrell of Bloomberg News.

Front Section, Pages 3 on 02/28/2013

Upcoming Events