(Advertisement)

Lawmen oppose ‘pot’ act

Sheriffs, police chiefs in accord

Posted: October 17, 2012 at 1:22 a.m.

Two Arkansas police associations on Tuesday announced their opposition to a ballot initiative that would legalize marijuana for medical use.

This story is only available from our archives.

Front Section, Pages 1 on 10/17/2012

(Advertisement)



« Previous Story

Hogs’ bye week: losing momentum vs. healing

Arkansas quarterback Tyler Wilson, who threw five touchdown passes against Kentucky on Saturday, said good weeks at practice can be turned into victories on the field.

The Arkansas Razorbacks finally got rolling the past two games, meshing their high-powered offense with an opp... Read »

Next Story »

Murphy Oil to separate retail, production uni...

Motorists fill up Tuesday at the Murphy Oil USA station at 23800 Chenal Parkway in Little Rock.

Murphy Oil Corp. shares jumped 8 percent Tuesday after the El Dorado-based company said it would spin off its ... Read »

Comments

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Please read our comment policy.

Well of course they do! The war on drugs provides a huge boost to the budgets of law enforcement departments all over the country but I'm not sure exactly what the local law enforcement entities *actually* have to lose if the voters expand the ability of Doctors to help patients. Marijuana will still be illegal to obtain and use "off label".

Doctors will be able to recommend medical marijuana to patients who are diagnosed *only* with the following conditions:

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Alzheimer’s (Treats symptoms of agitation)
Cancer
Chronic Pain
Crohn’s Disease
Epilepsy
Fibromyalgia
Glaucoma
Hepatitis C
HIV/AIDS
Multiple Sclerosis
Peripheral Neuropathy
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Tourette’s Disease
Ulcerative colitis

Here's a link to the AMMA text (NWA Online's comment system had an issue with the PDF link)
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com...

As a side (snide even) note...I've noticed the trend for this publication to use consistently use the word 'pot' in headlines, even to go as far as to call it "medical 'pot'". Is bandwidth such a premium that you can't be bothered to actually use the word marijuana or is it simply editorial passive aggression?

Posted by: Nilatir

October 17, 2012 at 9:11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Registration is required to make comments. Click here to LOGIN.
You can register for FREE to post comments and receive alerts.