HOW WE SEE IT: Ban On Sign Dancers Misguided
Posted: October 8, 2012 at 3:04 a.m.
Bill Engvall better stay out of Rogers.
This story is only available from our archives.
Opinion, Pages 5 on 10/08/2012
(Advertisement)
« Previous Story
COMMENTARY: Campaigning Tricky For Officehold...
Incumbency has long been regarded as a benefit in the neverending pursuit of re-election, but there’s no doubt it also has drawbacks. Read »
Next Story »
LETTERS
U.S. headed for a disaster It’s hard to believe that some Americans will vote for Barack Obama for another four-year term. He has America headed for a financial collapse an... Read »

Comments
To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Please read our comment policy.
Commissioners in search of a solution to a problem that does not exist.
Posted by: RDodger
October 8, 2012 at 10:38 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Thank you, voice of reason. The proposed ordinance does not apply to politicians and teenagers selling Whitey's chicken. It only discriminates against businesses -- the very people who could use a little understanding in exchange for their investment in the city.
Only about six businesses in Rogers use sign shakers although this inexpensive marketing tool would benefit other businesses. It's the perfect tool for a seasonal business that doesn't benefit from many other marketing tools. And let's not forget that these are jobs that people purposely apply for and they give it all they have. In a tough economy, we ought to be removing restrictions on businesses instead of adding needless ones.
It is discouraging to think that a business-friendly city like Rogers would even consider adding a business-unfriendly ordinance that is based on a handful of complaints over the years. People complain about traffic lights yet we don't get rid of them. And people are far more distracted by things like reading Facebook, putting on mascara, talking on the phone, and eating in the car. We aren't doing anything to stop that.
There are already ordinances that the city does not enforce consistently. Why are we adding one more?
Posted by: carrieperriensmith
October 9, 2012 at 10:49 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Registration is required to make comments. Click here to LOGIN.
You can register for FREE to post comments and receive alerts.