Three men have major Wimbledon advantage

Spain's Rafael Nadal  returns a ball during his match against Lukas Lacko from Slovakia at the  Gerry Weber Open, ATP tennis tournament in Halle, Germany, Thursday June 14, 2012. Nadal advanced to the quarterfinals and will face German Philipp Kohlschreiber.  (AP Photo/dapd/Joerg Sarbach)
Spain's Rafael Nadal returns a ball during his match against Lukas Lacko from Slovakia at the Gerry Weber Open, ATP tennis tournament in Halle, Germany, Thursday June 14, 2012. Nadal advanced to the quarterfinals and will face German Philipp Kohlschreiber. (AP Photo/dapd/Joerg Sarbach)

— As Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer step back on the grass at Wimbledon, each has reason to believe he’ll be hoisting the trophy in two weeks.

None of the other 125 men in the field can honestly say the same.

Indeed, it’s tough to imagine anyone outside thosethree winning this year’s championship at the All England Club, where play begins Monday.

“They’ve, you know, been pretty selfish about Grand Slamtitles for a little bit,” said 2003 U.S. Open champion and three-time Wimbledon runner-up Andy Roddick.

They sure have.

Either Nadal or Djokovic has won each of the past nine major tournaments, and they met in the past four finals, to boot.

“It’s up to somebody ... to break that mold,” said Federer, owner of a record 16 major titles. “I hope I can do that.”

Add him to the equation, and those three men have won a combined 28 of the past 29 majors, a seven-year run of dominance that began with Nadal’s victory at the 2005 French Open. (The lone exception was the 2009 U.S.Open, where Federer lost in the final to Juan Martin del Potro.)

The top-seeded Djokovic is the defending champion at Wimbledon - and while it’s the only grass-court title on his resume, it’s a rather significant one.

“I mean, this is what I’m born for,” he said after beating Nadal in four sets in the 2011final. “You know, I want to be a tennis champion. I want to win more Grand Slams. I will definitely not stop here.”

He moved to No. 1 in the ATP rankings the next day and has remained there, while compiling a 27-match winning streak in majors that included titles at the U.S. Open in September and Australian Open in January, before ending with a loss to Nadal in the rain-interrupted, two-day French Open final two weeks ago.

Nadal once was thought to be a clay-court expert but has shown that he can adapt to, and excel on, other surfaces, joining Federer among the seven men who have completed a career Grand Slam. At Wimbledon, the Spaniard reached the final each of the past five times he entered the tournament, winning twice and finishing runner-up to Djokovic or Federer the other three.

And Federer? Well, all he’s done is win six championships plus make one final at the All England Club in a seven-year span from 2003-2009.

“I would just like to get another Wimbledon crown. It would be amazing to get No. 7,” said Federer, who lost in the quarterfinals the past two years, to Tomas Berdych in 2010, and to Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in 2011.

1

He’s gone about 2 /2 years without winning a Grand Slam event, his longest drought since he won his first nine years ago.

His mastery of faster surfaces such as the grass at Wimbledon and the hard courts at the U.S. Open makes it tough to rule him out, even if he’s approaching his 31st birthday Aug. 8.

Asked to size up his prospects for adding to his major total, Federer said, “I think the upcoming two,” referring to Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, “those will be my best chances to win.”

While players such as Berdych or Tsonga or Roddick or del Potro have shown they can compete with the best on their best days - and No. 4 Andy Murray, a three-time major finalist, gets plenty of home-crowd support because he represents Britain - the expectation is that Djokovic, Nadal or Federer will extend their rule at Grand Slam tournaments.

Murray, for his part, dismisses questions about being burdened by all the attention he gets these two weeks - and all the hopes the locals have.

“Doesn’t add any extra pressure. I think in all sports, playing at home is viewed as being a huge advantage, whereas for some reason when it comes to Wimbledon, everyone thinks it’s a bad thing,” he said. “I haven’t really found it that way. When I’ve played here, I’ve enjoyed the challenge, I’ve enjoyed playing in front of a passionate crowd, and it’s helped me.”

Sports, Pages 27 on 06/24/2012

Upcoming Events