WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Wednesday not to tamper with the Depression-era program that protects U.S. sugar growers as it sped toward completion of a $500 billion bill to operate farm and food programs over the next five years.
The sugar program, which controls supply levels, sets prices and limits imports, has long been a target of those who say the government supports agribusiness over the interests of consumers.
But in a 53-46 vote, the Senate defeated an amendment to the farm bill that would have reduced the scope of the program, including eliminating a provision of the 2008 farm bill that required the federal government to buy surplus sugar which was then sold toethanol companies at a loss.
Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas voted against the amendment, while Republican Sen. John Boozman favored it.
Last week, the Senate by a similar vote also defeated anamendment to phase out the program entirely.
The sugar vote was one of the few remaining contentious issues as the Senate worked through some 73 amendments to the 1,000-page measure that establishes safety nets for farmers, authorizes conservation programs and funds the food-stamp program.
A final vote was expected this morning, sending it to the House where it could face an uphill battle. While the Senate bill cuts $23 billion from current spending levels over the next decade, the Republican-led House is likely to seek deeper cuts, particularly to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, food stamps, which costs $80 billion a year and makes up 80 percent of farm bill spending. The current farm act expires at the end of September.
The farm bill makes some substantial changes in farm policy, including eliminating direct payments to farmers even when they don’t plant crops, and consolidating conservation programs, butit doesn’t touch the federal sugar program, which dates back to 1930s legislation to protect domestic sugar growers and refiners.
The program is opposed by consumer groups and food and beverage associations that use sugar, which claim it drives up prices and forces U.S. confectioners to relocate overseas.
“This is the last opportunity for a bipartisan amendment to reform sugar subsidies that are costing consumers $3.5 billion a year and losing 20,000 jobs a year in this country,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., who sponsored the amendment with Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa.
Supporters of the program, which included senators from Northern and Western sugar beet states and Southern sugarcane states, countered that it does not cost taxpayers anything and that consumer sugar prices remain lower than those in other developed countries. Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said current sugar policy supports142,000 U.S. jobs. “If we’re importing cheap sugar at a point where we undermine American jobs, what have we gained?”
Still to be dealt with are amendments dealing with crop insurance - farmers currently are compensated for an average 62 percent of their crop insurance premiums and some senators are pushing for limits on those subsidies - and with Environmental Protection Agency aerial surveillance of farm operations.
Earlier Wednesday, the Senate approved an amendment by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., that would bar the agriculture secretary from making conservation payments to millionaires. Another approved amendmentby Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., and the panel’s ranking Republican, Richard Lugar of Indiana, prohibits North Korea from receiving Food for Peace Act donations unless the president issues a national-interest waiver.
Front Section, Pages 2 on 06/21/2012