PUBLIC VIEWPOINT: Bible Unclear On Abortion
Posted: March 4, 2010 at 4:59 a.m.
In his recent letter (Feb. 16), Terry Evers claims that “three verses from the Bible specifically prohibit abortion.” I may be missing something, but I don’t see this at all.
This story is only available from the archives. Click here to contact the online desk.
Opinion, Pages 5 on 03/04/2010
(Advertisement)
« Previous Story
It could have been worse
THE STATE’S first-ever fiscal session of the Legislature is now history, thank goodness, and the wonder is that it didn’t do any more damage than it did. Or as Governor Mik... Read »
Next Story »
COMMENTARY: Dr. Caudle’s Driver’s Ed Course
March is the time once again for the annual rant about drivers on our local interstate, affectionately referred to as the Talladega 540. Read »
Comments
To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Please read our comment policy.
.
Good points Charles.
However, with the totally INEFFECTUAL leadership of John Boozman nothing got done during the Republicon years of running things. Nothing! Boozman is useless to 3rd District voters and will be more useless as a U.S. Senator. Why should the 3rd District get anything from the stimulus package? Our Congressman Boozman voted against EVERY measure that could have provided funding.
.
Posted by: cdawg
March 4, 2010 at 6 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
If you live south of the Benton County line and your a
Democrat you don't have any representation in the 3rd District with Boozman. Check his record.
Posted by: humble
March 4, 2010 at 7:24 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
One can't argue in favor of abortion with logic as Thomas Atwater suggests. Where is the logic in the following
1. Prosecuting someone who kills a pregnant woman for 2 murders and not prosecuting the murder of only a child? Logical?
2. Arguing for the humane killing of a cow bound for slaughter while sucking the brain out of a preborn human. Logical?
3. Erring on the side of caution when using capital punishment and yet failing to do so with the extermination of innocents. Logical?
Interpretation of the Bible isn't needed to oppose abortion. And logic is obviously not a talent you possess.
Posted by: GregJ
March 4, 2010 at 10:23 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Long withheld from public knowledge deafferentation studies make it clear that the abortion issue is enveloped by the victimology recruitment practices of the democartic party, NOW, and Planned Parenthood.
andyadkins.livejournal.com/229924.html
andyadkins.livejournal.com/tag/science
(scroll down to sept 1, 2009 and begin reading back from there. The actual science of abortion projects the ongoing horrific cognitive and social consequences of its practice.
ex) From andyadkins.livejournal.com/229924.html
homosexuality and abortion
I noticed you did not address the incontrovertible brain science associated with abortion. In fact, no other poster addressed the brain science.
How can I be anti-woman for encouraging women to take responsibility for managing their sexuality, demanding effective birth control, and taking responsibility to protect their cognitive development when they become pregnant . Pregnancy is not just a body issue since the more any physiological aspect is exercised then the larger the space it occupies on the somatosensory and motor cortices. The amount of space occupied on the somatosensory and motor cortices determines the amount of neuronetworks that are involved in processing the affairs of that body feature (You can't give up prominent brain features and expect to be as intelligent. And as demonstrated through the genetic basis of the homosexual persona the activation of the structural conditions for sexuality are subject to only negligible neuroplasticity. )
andyadkins.livejournal.com/229924.html ....
as a side note to those caught up with worshipping the mongrels of cutthroat hero fantasies swept by the policies of death knell devaluative borrowing and commoditization of being in terms that enslave others in service of your restricted comfort......Care is beyond the reach of the disjunctivized minds of the individuated
sincerely,
the lost irreplaceable future
Posted by: andyadkins
March 5, 2010 at 11:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
GregJ--
Mr. Atwater didn't suggest that you could argue logically for abortion; he said that you cannot argue against it using the Bible.
Reading comprehension is obviously not a talent you possess.
Posted by: alpha_cat
March 5, 2010 at 9 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
If you had an abortion and were not informed about the resulting cognitive dysfunctions that result, the abortion provider is financially liable. I also encourage communities that have experienced debasement since the arrival of these clinics to seek recompense for the cost increases to social services (police, drug and alcohol, child protection services, and facilities of incarceration)that are, in part, products of abortions individuating hinderance of the communicative beneficence of the hive.
Posted by: andyadkins
March 6, 2010 at 4:36 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
If you had an abortion and were not informed about the cognitive dysfunctions that result, the abortion provider is financially liable. I also encourage communities that have experienced debasement since the arrival of these clinics to seek recompense for the cost increases to social services (police, drug and alcohol, child protection services, and facilities of incarceration)that are, in part, products of abortions individuating hinderance of the communicative beneficence of the hive.
andyadkins.livejournal.com/tag/science
Posted by: andyadkins
March 6, 2010 at 6:22 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
"Bringing the experimental science of life and mind into a closer and more harmonious relationship with phenomenological investigations of experience and subjectivity" Evan Thompson
http://andyadkins.livejournal.com/228...
If homosexuality is a behavioral response to genetically determined sensory and motor development and arrangement of neural architecture, then homosexuals who are pro-choice are idiots because they are arguing that body decisions have nothing to do with the organization and makeup of the brain. (UPDATE http://andyadkins.livejournal.com/229... )Gays should hate the pro-choice movement because it is premised on the condition that the cognitive orientations of sexual functions can be changed ergo homosexuality is a choice...therefore can be classified as behavioral dysfunction
There is a reason why we outlaw choices that dispose cognitive conditions to exhibit behavioral sociopathies.
The dissociativeness of pain impairs the neurological subroutines for high functioning echolocation and telementation (these are metacognitive functions and thus very different from the protein/enzymatic thalamo-amygdaloid based and somewhat heteromodally limited emoting that even paramecium routinely, though crudely, synaptically advent).
The dissociativeness of pain interferes with echolocative& telementational functions because it redirects the attention of executive neuroanatomy to solving the what is physically missing problem. At first, large stretches of the right hemisphere are expended to identify why the somatosenseory and motor cortices are not providing electromagnetic neural registers of their conditioned purpose (fetal care cognitive network that, after birth, participates in the child care cognitivie network).The missing signals absorb an imbalanced portion of frontal lobe attention thus distracting it from the world outside and thus manifesting immediate discombobulated behavior. Eventual classification transfers the problem as representation to the left hemisphere where it becomes a slave to synesthetics (refers information events back to right hemisphere for reinterpretation of what is missing & called "pain").. that are partially obscurred by the restricted single hemispheric manifestation of self-limiting verbal personality.
http://andyadkins.livejournal.com/tag...
http://andyadkins.livejournal.com/212...
http://andyadkins.livejournal.com/209...
html Tags: Science, crimes against humanity, theory of mind
Posted by: andyadkins
March 7, 2010 at 4:03 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Andy your going to deep to make a point. Remember
to keep it short & to the point. Your making it a pain to read because its to deep.
Posted by: humble
March 7, 2010 at 6:38 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Truth and being are deep and consequential. Simplification opens the door to erroneous points of contest. There is no debating this issue...Removing body parts initiates phantom limb syndrome and likewise removing the products of sexuality create a disturbing psychological shadow that casts a pall across the community.
I accept that there are convenient readers who are only looking for preferred hooks. I am not providing a written physiological illustration of the ramifications of anatomical function for them. I did it to make clear to the conscientious reader that there is no debating the fact that abortion is a crime against the community and as such it is important that women are told that they do not have control over their bodies if they are forced towards the decision of abortion. Their bodies and lives are not theirs if their products are unintended and feed the wealth engines of murderers and power hungry elites with "sexed up" narratives (THEY LIE about their lives and use the media as a tool for personal glory and enrichment and damn the drones as slaves).(THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL, by example, WAS PART OF AN ONGOING "STRONG WOMAN" PLOY to sucker dupes)
In short, stop treating the bodies of women like commodities. Make sure that they are protected and know how to manage their sexuality; the intellectual capacity of the community depends on it.
Posted by: andyadkins
March 7, 2010 at 7:13 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Registration is required to make comments. Click here to LOGIN.
You can register for FREE to post comments and receive alerts.