Waste found in 'green' energy projects

— The four drafty buildings had been fixtures of the Energy Department complex in Oak Ridge, Tenn., for more than half a century. They burned energy like 1950s sedans.

The buildings seemed like perfect candidates for a federal conservation retrofit program that relies on private contractors that receive a percentage of the money they save. A deal was struck in 2001. The contractor reworked lighting and heating systems, among other things, and began collecting payments.

The project was counted among the department's "green" successes - until auditors discovered that the buildings had been torn down several years ago, and the government had paid $850,000 for energy savings at facilities that no longer existed.

The audit findings show the potential for waste and abuse at a time when the department is poised to launch billions of dollars more in stimulus spending on an unprecedented welter of green projects across the country.

The initiatives are hallmarks of the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act approved by Congress in February. The stimulus law directed almost $17 billion to the department's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, including $3.2 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants and $3.1 billion for state energy programs.

The outsourcing arrangements such as those at Oak Ridge, known as "energy savings performance contracts," or ESPCs, will probably be an integral part of those efforts, according to government and industry officials.

In December, the department issued 16 deals called Super ESPCs that may be worth as much as $80 billion over the next quarter-century.

The explosion in green spending is occurring despite well-documented weaknesses at the core of the strategy: A chronic lack of government officials assigned and properly trained to oversee the financially and technically complex projects.

The problems are not exclusive to Oak Ridge. The auditors, from the department's inspector general's office, also determined that $565,000 had been paid over six years under the same arrangement to a contractor in Texas for a high efficiency laundry that was no longer in use. The department also paid out $3.4 million on another project without checking whether the conservation measures worked - and $160,000 for measurements that were never taken.

At the same time, the auditors found, some contractors appeared to use inflated energy cost estimates in their savings calculations, increasing their fees.

"Our review established that weaknesses in the Department's contract management strategy for ESPCs ... directly contributed to each of the above deficiencies," the department's inspector general, Gregory Friedman, wrote in a memo accompanying the report.

Energy Department officials acknowledged the problems with the outsourcing program. The newest inspector general audit, launched in anticipation of the stimulus spending, targeted four contracts worth $256 million. One of them involved Oak Ridge's massive Y-12 National Security Complex, where nuclear weapons are assembled.

The contractor, Honeywell, was hired in 2001 to upgrade a World War II-era office building, a laboratory from the 1950s, a library and structure that housed a cafeteria and records.

But not long after the work was completed, officials at Oak Ridge decided to tear down the buildings as part of an overhaul. The demolition began in 2005.

Honeywell notified the department that it could buy out the company's contract. But department officials did not take up the suggestion. Instead, the department continued to pay - $850,000 more than necessary.

An Energy Department spokesman acknowledged the missteps in the program but said the department had saved taxpayers more than $4 million in operations and maintenance costs by tearing down the buildings as part of a project to renovate the complex.

Front Section, Pages 3 on 09/21/2009

Upcoming Events