Phosphorus in check, water study shows
UA engineer calls further discharge reductions ‘a waste of money’
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Results of a water-quality study released Tuesday show that discharges into Osage and Spring creeks do not violate state limits on phosphorus content.
The $425,000 study, commissioned in 2007 by Springdale and Rogers, shows phosphorus levels downstream from wastewater treatment plants in the two towns are well below the 1 milligram per liter limit. The study will be submitted to the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality and the federalEnvironmental Protection Agency, which has plans to study the entire Illinois River Watershed beginning next year.
Springdale and Rogers commissioned the study hoping to refute the EPA’s assertion that too much phosphorus is being discharged into the creeks. The streams, both within the Illinois River watershed, have been on the ...
Subscribers must LOG-IN to read this full story.
Monthly and yearly online subscriptions are available starting at only $5.95. Access is free for print subscribers. Click here to see rates and register.
Northwest Arkansas, Pages 9 on 12/09/2009
Comments
To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Please read our comment policy.
river1939_suddenlink.net says...
If I am not mistaken, the EPA requirement for the new NACA plant is 0.1 milligrams per liter rather than 1.0 milligrams per liter as reported in this article. Of course, I may be wrong.
Joe Nix
December 9, 2009 at 6:11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
STIR_INC says...
Hot dog! Rogers and Springdale pay for a study by an Arkansas University that shows their pollution is OK.
Let's hope EPA has enough sense to see through this ploy. You know that ADEQ will buy it. Oklahoma won't.
Riverok
December 9, 2009 at 7:24 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
postman says...
what a joke. we're talking senseless when it comes to the EPA.they didn't like the propellant in the old asthma inhalers either, because it would "destroy the ozone layer". now the same medicine costs 10 times as much and is not nearly as effective, thanks to your government in action.
postman
December 9, 2009 at 7:23 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Registration is required to make comments. Click here to LOGIN.
You can register for FREE to post comments and receive alerts.